Reconstruction:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/skuq
Proto-Sino-Tibetan
Reconstruction
- Proto-Sino-Tibetan:
- Proto-Tibeto-Burman: *s-g(r)aw-k (STEDT)
See also Zhang, Jacques & Lai 2019 (p. 81).
The disappearance of the final uvular in rGyalrongic is irregular; due to this irregularity, Jacques suspects a Wanderwort relationship.[1] Miyake suspects Tangut 𗻵 (*kjụ¹) in particular to be borrowed from Middle Chinese 韭 (*kjuwX),[2] but Miyake's explanation cannot account for other rGyalrongic cognates since they start with a sibilant that was already lost in the supposed Middle Chinese etymon. However, the rGyalrongic open syllables can be more easily explained with one straightforward borrowing of Old Chinese 韭 (*s.[k](r)uʔ).
The -o- vowel in Tibetan is irregular, but the same correspondence to Old Chinese -u- is also found in *lmuk (“hat”).
Noun
*skuq
Descendants
- Chinese: 韭 (OC *s.[k](r)uʔ (B-S)) (see there for further descendants)
- Bodish
- Tibetic
- Tibetan: སྒོག་པ (sgog pa)
- Tibetic
- rGyalrongic
- West rGyalrongic
- Horpa
- Geshiza: skuə (“leek”)
- Tangut: 𗻵 (*kjụ¹, “(spring) onion”)
- Khroskyabs: skû (“onion”)
- Horpa
- East rGyalrongic
- Japhug: ɕku (“onion”)
- Situ: ɕkō (Brag-bar), ʃkō (Cogtse)
- West rGyalrongic
- Naic
- Jingpho-Asakian
- ⇒ Jingpho: shakau
- Tani
- ⇒ Apatani: byaku’ tale’ (“onion”)